SNAPSHOT OF INDICATORS
Summary of the sample design for PMA2015/Kinshasa, DRC:
The PMA2015/Kinshasa-R3 Survey in Detail
The first three rounds of data collection occurred exclusively in Kinshasa. For the third round of data collection (PMA2015/Kinshasa-R3), the project sampled 58 enumeration areas (EAs) to achieve a representative urban sample in Kinshasa. The EAs were selected systematically using probability proportional to size within urban/rural strata.
Before data collection, all households, private service delivery points (SDPs) and key landmarks in each EA were listed and mapped by trained resident enumerators (REs) to create a sampling frame for the second stage of sampling for households and private SDPs. The mapping and listing process took place the first week of data collection in each EA with the help of cartographers and supervisors. Once households had been listed, field supervisors systematically selected 30 households per EA using a random number-generating mobile-phone application. All members of the selected households were enumerated by the interviewers when completing household questionnaires, and from this household roster, all eligible women (aged 15-49) were approached and asked to provide informed consent (and assent if aged 15-17 years) to participate in the study.
Up to three private SDPs located within each EA were selected from the list of SDPs available in the EA. In addition, three public SDPs, primary health centers, secondary medical centers with or without a surgery units and tertiary regional or national/teaching hospitals serving the selected EA populations were selected.
Weights were adjusted for non-response, and applied to all estimations at the household and individual level in the presented tables.
|Household response rate*||99.1%||--||99.1%||96.7%||--||96.7%|
|Interviews with women ages 15 to 49|
|Number of eligible women**||23,748||--||23,748||2,815||--||2,815|
|Number of eligible women interviewed||23,020||--||23,020||2,683||--||2,683|
|Eligible women response rate||96.9%||--||96.9%||95.3%||--||95.3%|
**Eligible women response rates include only women identified in completed household interviews
†Eligible women response rate = eligible women interviewed/eligible women
Sources: Ministry of Planning and Monitoring Implementation of the Revolution of Modernity (MPSMRM), Ministry of Public Health (MSP) and ICF International, 2014. Democratic Republic of the Congo Demographic and Health Survey 2013-2014. Rockville, Maryland, USA : MPSMRM, MSP and ICF International; and the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 (PMA2020) survey PMA2015/Kinshasa, DRC Round 3.
Sample Error Estimates
|Variable||Value [R]||Standard Error (SE)||R-2SE||R+2SE|
|Age-specific fertility rate for women ages 15-19||0.074||0.007||0.058||0.089|
|All women ages 15-49|
|Currently using a modern method||0.170||0.008||0.154||0.186|
|Currently using a traditional method||0.173||0.008||0.158||0.190|
|Currently using any contraceptive method||0.343||0.010||0.323||0.364|
|Currently using injectables||0.021||0.003||0.016||0.028|
|Currently using male condoms||0.087||0.006||0.075||0.100|
|Currently using implants||0.024||0.003||0.018||0.031|
|Chose method by self or jointly in past 12 months||0.865||0.012||0.841||0.887|
|Paid fees for family planning services in past 12 months||0.348||0.017||0.316||0.381|
|Informed by provider about other methods||0.351||0.017||0.319||0.386|
|Informed by provider about side effects||0.361||0.023||0.318||0.407|
|Satisfied with provider: Would return and refer friend/relative to provider||0.512||0.026||0.461||0.563|
|Visited by health worker who talked about family planning in past 12 months||0.200||0.019||0.166||0.239|
|Women in union ages 15-49|
|Currently using a modern method||0.204||0.013||0.179||0.230|
|Currently using a traditional method||0.220||0.013||0.195||0.247|
|Currently using any contraceptive modern method||0.423||0.016||0.392||0.455|
|Currently using injectables||0.033||0.006||0.023||0.046|
|Currently using male condoms||0.074||0.009||0.059||0.093|
|Currently using implants||0.039||0.006||0.028||0.052|
|Chose method by self or jointly in past 12 months||0.888||0.014||0.856||0.913|
|Paid fees for family planning services in past 12 months||0.336||0.022||0.294||0.380|
|Informed by provider about other methods||0.418||0.023||0.373||0.464|
|Informed by provider about side effects||0.442||0.032||0.380||0.507|
|Satisfied with provider: Would return and refer friend/relative to provider||0.567||0.035||0.497||0.634|
|Visited by health worker who talked about family planning in past 12 months||0.281||0.029||0.229||0.341|
Tulane University School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa School of Public Health and The Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health at The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 (PMA2020) Survey Round 3, PMA2015/DRC-R3 (Kinshasa) Snapshot of Indicators. 2015. Kinshasa, DRC and Baltimore, Maryland, USA.